Last week, the magazine employees went on a daylong retreat. The staff and lovely interns worked through a variety of different exercises all addressing different issues. What’s the magazine’s identity, who do we want to be? How do we get there? And more of those types of things. The most interesting part of the day was a discussion about the magazine’s design issues, more specifically, its problems with the cover. A critique of the magazine is that its covers aren’t cohesive. There’s no way of seeing an issue from a distance and knowing, without a doubt, that is the newest issue of Charlotte Magazine. Unlike fashion magazines, regional magazines don’t always have a celebrity or model on the cover so they’re left with forming a cohesive look between a variety of different images, a stack of pancakes, a doctor, or school children for an example.
The conversation got me thinking. What makes a good magazine cover? And which of fashion and women's magazines have a cover that is brand defining?
Hands down the most recognizable covers are Cosmopolitan and Elle. Cosmopolitan always has a woman, with a hand on her hip and the other arm dangling. The cover features a bright background with bright fonts. The women cover the same part of the Cosmopolitan header and even the bubble header is in the same place month after month.
Really interesting topic. I've never liked the Cosmo covers, but they are certainly recognizable. Never noticed that the pose was repeated! (I suppose that makes sense, since I don't really read cosmo that much :))
ReplyDeleteI think Numero is excellent in this respect, but I think The New Yorker undoubtedly takes the cake! Perhaps you could look into illustration for Charlotte..